Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Is Trump a Bad Man?

What seems bad to one person may not seem bad to another person because bad is always defined relative to some standard, and people don't all have the same standards.

For example, I have always believed that good people try to develop their minds and learn about the world and understand how things work, but Trump seems ignorant of the most commonplace facts about history or science and shows no obvious interest in learning anything new.

I have always believed that good people tell the truth, but Trump lies without ceasing.

I have always believed that good people are generous and sharing, but Trump is grasping and greedy.

I have always believed that good leaders find ways for everyone to win, but Trump brags about beating his enemies.

I have always believed that good leaders accept the blame when things go wrong and share the credit when things go right, but Trump takes credit for anything he thinks will gild his reputation and blames someone else for everything that goes wrong.

I have always believed that good people are modest and humble, but Trump is proud and arrogant.

I have always believed that good people have some spiritual dimension to their lives and care about values like goodness and beauty, but Trump, as far as I can see, is completely materialistic and cares only about money and fame.

I have always believed that good people treat other human beings with dignity and respect, but Trump is a name caller, an insulter, a bully.

I guess people who like Trump must have different standards than I do, but to me, relative to everything I have ever believed in, Trump is a bad man.

That's why I have to fight him, and all that he stands for.

If you see some good in Trump please share it in the comments section.

***

[Very important book about how people are persuaded in a post-truth world.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Monday, December 18, 2017

Cheap Trick "Christmas Christmas"

Cheap Trick got their well-deserved spot in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2016 and they are BACK with three new albums in two years including “Christmas Christmas” released on October 20, 2017!

I have been enjoying Cheap Trick music since I heard “Ain't That a Shame” back in 1979 on CHOM-FM coming out of Montreal while I lived in the Adirondack Mountains of upstate New York as a teenager. It was a live recording I heard, from the legendary “Cheap Trick at Budokan” album recorded in Japan. That song, and that album, defined for me what rock and roll was supposed to sound like and Budokan was the first album I ever bought.

In their first ten years Cheap Trick put out nine studio albums from their scary-dark debut “Cheap Trick” in 1977 to “The Doctor” in 1986. These years included masterpieces like “In Color” in 1977 which made it into Rolling Stone's list of the 500 greatest albums of all time (Budokan is also on that list), along with “Dream Police,” “All Shook Up,” and “One on One” in 1979, 1980, and 1982 respectively.

After the first decade the albums came slower but included great moments like 1988's “Lap of Luxury” with the number one hit, “The Flame.”

Then, from April 2016 to October 2017 Cheap Trick went on a Rock and Roll rampage, getting inducted into the Hall of Fame and releasing not one, not two, but THREE excellent albums including the latest, “Christmas Christmas.”

This latest album has 8 covers that provide a veritable history of rock and roll Christmas songs from Chuck Berry's “Run Rudolph Run” in 1958 to Jimmy Fallon's cheerfully nihilist Saturday Night Live song from 2000 “I Wish it was Christmas Today.” Along the way Cheap Trick covers Wizzard and Slade, Harry Nilsson and The Kinks, The Ramones and Charles Brown's 1960 masterpiece “Please Come Home for Christmas” which was also covered by The Eagles in 1978.

The album includes a solemn and beautiful version of the Christmas classic “Silent Night” with majestic chords and three original Cheap Trick songs: “Merry Christmas Darlings” about getting together with family and “Our Father of Life” and “Christmas Christmas” which are a Part 1 and Part 2, the first slow and reflective, the second ending the album with a high energy bang.

Cheap Trick's “Christmas Christmas” sets a high standard for future rock and roll Christmas albums and is destined to be pulled out every holiday season for many years to come.

After 40 years of recording Cheap Trick is still defining what rock and roll is supposed to sound like and what it's supposed to do: fill you with energy and make you feel GOOD.

Merry Christmas Darlings!


***
[A great new rock and roll Christmas album for your collection.]
[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on links like the one below to buy your stuffbooks. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***
Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

George 1: George's First Hero

George Washington's father Augustine died when George was only 11 years old. Augustine left three plantations and 64 slaves to be divided among his three sons. He had spent most of his time growing tobacco but he was also active in the Anglican Church and served his community as Justice of the Peace and County Sheriff. He was only 48 when he died.

George's mother was Mary Ball Washington. After her husband died she raised George and managed the land he inherited until he became an adult. When he was 14 George was very enthusiastic about joining the British Navy and most of his relatives and friends thought that would be a great career. All the arrangements were made and he was just about to depart when his mother finally said no.

Good thing for us. Joining the British navy would have radically changed George's life and might have altered the course of U.S. history beyond recognition.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

["Washington: A Life" By Ron Chernow is one of the best single volume biographies of our greatest President.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

The greatest hero of George's youth was his older half-brother Lawrence. In George's earliest years Lawrence was far away in England going to school. When George was about eight years old Lawrence returned home but soon left again for two years of service in the oddly named War of Jenkin's Ear between the British and the American colonists on one side and the Spanish and French on the other.

Lawrence served in the Caribbean and survived, even though fighting and disease produced a ferocious mortality rate of about 90% on the Americans who served there. (For the men from Massachusetts it was even worse. Out of 5000 who went to war only 50 made it home. 99% died.)

When Lawrence got home to Virginia and inherited an estate from his father he named it Mount Vernon after the Admiral Vernon he served under during the war. That home would later become George's, and is now one of the most famous historical sites in the United States.

***

Note:
My biographical study of George Washington was intended for my own education but I thought I would also like to share what I have learned here on my blog. The main sources of information I used were:

First, "George Washington: A Biography" by Washington Irving. I like this one because it was written by one of our early American literary masters and because it was written so long ago that Irving often mentions talking with people who had actually seen George.

Second, "Washington: An abridgement in one volume By Richard Harwell of the seven-volume George Washington" By Douglas Southall Freeman. I wanted the complete seven volume set but that is not yet available on Kindle. Too bad. Still, this abridgement is a great work, packed with information.

Third, "Washington: A Life" By Ron Chernow. This is an excellent modern biography that came out in 2010, helping me to get some of the more recent research missing from the older biographies.

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Sunday, December 3, 2017

How to Create a Prosperous Society

"Through Nasar's ambitious storytelling, we see Western society evolve from one in which most people live in poverty to one in which government tries to grapple with unemployment and inflation and raise the standard of living for all."
Alana Semuels, Los Angeles Times Book Review

This book promises to show us how economic understanding has led to increased prosperity for much of the world over the last 150 years. I started reading it about four years ago and stopped because it seemed like it was not going to keep that promise. Then I started reading it again about two years ago and gave up again.

Finally I started reading it once more a few months ago and read it all the way through and now I think it is one of the best and most important books I have ever read about creating a better society for all.

This book tells the life stories and great ideas of the greatest economists who have taught society how to succeed at producing and distributing greater wealth then older societies ever imagined possible. Syliva Nasar keeps the story very interesting while still teaching us a good deal about economics.

We learn about Beatrice Potter who had a stormy relationship with a powerful British Cabinet Minister who wanted a subservient woman so she married Sidney Webb instead and spent her life promoting the importance of government aid to the poor. We learn about Hayek who taught that governments should leave the economy alone but, in my opinion, went too far in that direction. We learn about Joan Robinson who was a brilliant economist but who fell for communist propaganda and went much too far in the direction opposite to Hayek, as she defended ruthless dictatorships. We learn about Keynes who taught governments how to manage recessions and we meet Amartya Sen who studies "third world" poverty today.

I think the most important thing we learn from this book is that we have to be both smart and moderate in our economic policies. Governments need to promote free and competitive markets while also providing vital infrastructure like stable currencies, roads, schools, electrical power, communications, public health services, law enforcement, court systems, etc.

Governments also have to referee between various economic actors. They have to find the delicate balance that will allow them to promote the well-being of business without hurting the poor while they simultaneously promote the well-being of workers without making it impossible for business to succeed.

To have good and successful lives in a good and prosperous society it is all about being smart and not going to any extreme, either on the left or the right. This book can help us find the path.

***

[Read this great book on economics and how to create prosperous societies.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Saturday, November 18, 2017

Beating Alzheimer's....

This is an important and hopeful book.

As the author says early on: "Here, finally, is nothing less than the first good news about Alzheimer's disease. It is a chronicle of joy, of the blessing of getting your life back. One of the patients you shall read about said he has allowed himself to think about the future once again when he talks to his grandchildren. Another said her memory is better than it has been in thirty years.... What you read about here is the beginning of a changed world, the beginning of the end of Alzheimer's disease."

We learn about a specific patient named Kristin who was noticing some decline in her mental abilities. She would get lost driving on the highway and forget which exit to take. She was finding it more difficult to analyze data at work and started thinking about resigning. She couldn't remember simple bits of information and had to start writing everything down.

Kristin worked with her own doctor to start following the author's ReCODE protocol and within three months she saw great improvement! No more worries about work, no more getting lost on the highway, no more forgetting little bits of information.

If his theory is correct Dr. Bredesen thinks there are three threats the brain is trying to protect itself against when it produces amyloid that is associated with Alzheimer's:

  1. Inflammation from infection, diet, or some other source.
  2. Lack of proper nutrients for the brain.
  3. Toxic substances such as metals or biotoxins.

The goal of the ReCODE protocol is to:

  1. Remove these threats to the brain.
  2. Then remove the amyloid.
  3. Then rebuild any damaged synapses.

As an overarching principle the author says that anything that is bad for general health or cardiovascular health is probably going to increase your risk of Alzheimers, so many of the things he mentions will sound familiar.

Here are some of the things that can increase our risk of Alzheimer's according to this book:

  1. Too much sugar
  2. Lack of rest
  3. Being overweight
  4. Too much stress
  5. Lack of exercise
  6. Lack of sunlight
  7. Eating trans-fats
  8. Smoking
  9. High blood pressure
  10. Too many Omega-6 fats and too few Omega-3 fats

The author also mentioned some things that surprised me a bit:

  1. Too much dairy (which can trigger inflammation)
  2. Too much gluten (which can damage the gastrointestinal tract and trigger inflammation)
  3. Taking too many antacids (which reduces the body's ability to extract nutrients from food)
  4. Too many statins (Cholesterol too LOW can increase risk of brain atrophy! I never heard of this one!)
  5. Poor oral hygiene

I am not a doctor so I cannot evaluate the medical advice given by Dr. Bredesen in this book. However, I do feel confident that if you want to help a loved one with Alzheimer's or avoid Alzheimer's yourself reading this book will NOT be a waste of time.

***

[Read this great book on beating Alzheimer's.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Monday, November 13, 2017

Tyrants turned pale.... : Studying Voltaire

Sunday morning.
My favorite time.
MY time!
Let's LEARN!

This morning I am studying the life of Voltaire. He spent decades fighting for tolerance and freedom and changed the world for the better. He fought tyranny and fanaticism and cruelty and he didn't care if his enemies were priests or bishops or aristocrats or kings he fought them all and he would never stop.

Two times he was arrested and sent to the Bastille and three times he was exiled from his homeland. Later in life he lived on the border between France and Switzerland so when the authorities came for him he could run! He would antagonize the rulers of the land with his criticisms and mockery and then, when they came for him, he would escape across the border.

Some people criticized him for running but I admire him. He was a guerrilla fighter against an oppressive government. Hit and run! We should ALWAYS hit the bad people. But then we have no obligation to let the bad people hit us back....

Voltaire was one of the most brilliant men of the 1700's and a literary genius whose pen made him the most famous man in the world and, ultimately, one of the richest.

He lived long enough to be recognized as a hero of civilization and great people from all over the world, people like Benjamin Franklin from the United States, made pilgrimages to his home to visit the giant of the age.

The French philosopher, and editor of the famous Encyclopedie, Diderot wrote of Voltaire while he was still alive: “Pile assumptions on assumptions; accumulate wars on wars; make interminable disturbances succeed to interminable disturbances; let the universe be inundated by a general spirit of confusion; and it would take a hundred thousand years for the works and the name of Voltaire to be lost.”

In the 1800's the British historian Thomas Babington Macaulay wrote: “In truth, of all the intellectual weapons that have been wielded by man, the most terrible was the mockery of Voltaire. Bigots and tyrants, who had never been moved by the wailings and cursing of millions, turned pale at his name.”

Whenever we feel grateful for being free, we should remember Voltaire.

[Read this excellent biography of the great Voltaire.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Sunday, October 15, 2017

"Mad With Joy" - G.K. Chesterton

I've been reading a lot about G K Chesterton lately. One of those people I love to spend time with. So smart they seem scary. So smart they keep losing me and I have to back up circling around and around to pick up the trail again. So smart that every sentence they write, almost, is worth pausing over to contemplate and ponder.

About Francis of Assisi Chesterton wrote: "...all true joy expresses itself in asceticism. It was 'the universe itself' that made Francis's followers 'mad with joy' - 'the only thing really worthy of enjoyment....' Ultimately, people in Chesterton's view are either optimists or pessimists: either they see 'life black against white' or 'white against black.' And the Franciscans embraced sacrifice because they saw life as 'full of the blaze of an universal mercy,' whereas pessimists indulge themselves because they see only 'a black curtain of incalculable night.' But Chesterton concludes: 'The revelers are old, and the monks are young. It was the monks who were the spendthrifts of happiness, and we who are its misers.' "

Chesterton wandered through early 20th century London thinking like this, writing like this, wearing a cape and a sombrero and a sword-stick, talking to himself and getting lost because his mind was so often present elsewhere.

He wrote somewhere around 100 books including poetry, fiction, essays, travel, literary criticism, Christian apologetics, and detective stories.

Scary smart.

***

[Read this great biography of the scary smart G.K. Chesterton.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Western Intellectual Tradition - A Book To Make the Earth Tilt....

Look what came in the mail yesterday! (Saturday 30-Sep-2017)

So I was up reading before dawn today....

This book traces the development of the main ideas of Western Civilization from the 1400's to the 1800's, the weakening of the medieval Christian synthesis, the growing chasm between science and the humanities, the ever more rapid gain of reliable knowledge combined with the ever more rapid loss of human meaning.

By describing the greatest ideas about the most important issues of an entire civilization this book helps us to sort out what we believe for ourselves and how we understand the world and how we understand our place in it.

This is the kind of book that makes the earth tilt... makes your hands tremble... makes it hard to catch your breath....

***

[Read this great book about the people who started the United States.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Sunday, October 1, 2017

The Spirit of the Framers....

I love this little story about John Adams as an old man:

"When one young man tried to congratulate him for belonging to a truly heroic generation, Adams felt obliged to correct him: 'I ought not to object to your reverence for your fathers, meaning those concerned with the direction of public affairs,' he cautioned, 'but to tell you a very great secret, as far as I am capable of comparing the merit of different periods, I have no reason to believe that we were better than you are.' "

When we study the Constitutional Convention we see that the participants were smart, but there are lots of smart people around now.

And yet, in 1787, a group that disagreed on many issues, ultimately wrote a complete Constitution for an entirely new government, that was then accepted by the people of every single state! Now, in 2017, we can't even get a health care bill passed, or reach a compromise on gun safety.

I think the biggest difference is that in 1787 leaders were debating HONESTLY, which doesn't mean they never shaded the truth but that they were sincerely trying to solve a problem. In 2017 leaders are not really trying to solve problems, they are trying to WIN and make their opponents look bad.

I think that is the difference.

I think if we could get people to argue less about parties and factions - which are hopeless arguments that never end - and argue more about problems and solutions - which are practical arguments that can lead to progress - we might be able to recapture some of the spirit of 1787 and make the world a better place!

***

[Read this great book about the people who started the United States.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Thursday, September 28, 2017

My 2017-2018 Reading Plan: Knowledge, Intelligence, Wisdom

1. Why Are Mental Skills Important?

The key mental skills form the foundation for everything we will ever do in life and they go a long way in determining how successful we will be. NOTHING is more important than our ability to think effectively and make good decisions.

You might think being born rich is more important than having good mental skills but without these skills how will you avoid losing your money and how will you know how to use it in ways that will be most effective in achieving your goals?

You might think good health is more important than having good mental skills but without these skills how will you know how to preserve your health, or make the best of a bad situation if you should lose it?

You might think that relationships with other people are more important than mental skills but without these skills how will you know which relationships are helpful to you, and how those relationships can best be nurtured, and, on the other hand, how will you know which relationships are harming you, and how those can best be broken off?

Clearly mental skills guide us in everything we do and lead us in every decision we make. If these skills are well developed we can expect them to guide us well and lead us to success, and if they are not well developed we can expect them to let us down and lead us to failure.

2. What are the most important mental skills?

The most important mental skills are knowledge, intelligence, and wisdom.

Knowledge is simply the awareness of facts. The more facts you pack into your brain the more knowledge you have. Knowledge is a vital foundation for developing intelligence and wisdom but it is also valuable in its own right by helping us solve simple problems and make simple decisions.

If you know there is a restaurant across town that serves good food at a reasonable price that knowledge will be extremely useful to you when you are hungry.

If you have a headache and you know that aspirin relieves headache pain and you know there is a bottle of aspirin on the little table beside your bed, that knowledge will also be very useful and could make the difference between enjoying a pleasant day and enduring a miserable one.

At a more advanced intellectual level, if you hear someone argue that all of the Founding Fathers of the United States agreed that the Federal government was not permitted to do anything unless it was explicitly authorized by the Constitution BUT you know that George Washington supported a national bank AND you know that he was a Founding Father AND you know that there is no explicit authorization in the Constitution for a national bank then this knowledge will help you to refute the argument being made.

To gain the benefits that mental skills can give us we need more than knowledge, we also need to develop intelligence.

Intelligence is the ability to construct and analyze logical arguments. The better you are at following premises through to conclusions and the better you are at spotting conclusions that are NOT derived from the premises offered to support them - the more intelligent you are.

For example, if someone says it will be better for the US economy to cut taxes for the rich and someone else says, "Oh that is an ultra-right-wing activist speaking. We should not even consider any policy proposals made by that person because they will obviously be wrong," then we should notice that this statement contains a fallacy. Whether a statement is true or false depends on the available factual and logical support offered on its behalf. The truth or falsity of a statement does not depend in any way on the political beliefs of the person making the statement.

If we are able to recognize this type of fallacy, which is a form of the ad hominem fallacy, then we are more intelligent than people who cannot recognize it.

For another example, suppose the minimum wage is raised and then the economy begins to grow faster than it was growing before, and we hear someone argue that since the economic growth started AFTER the minimum wage was increased then the growth must have been CAUSED by the increase.

If we are intelligent we will notice that this argument is also a fallacy. There is no necessary relationship between timing and causation. Even if we see the sun rise ten mornings in a row shortly after the rooster crows that does not prove that the rooster's crow CAUSED the sun to rise.

Certainly events are caused by other events but just because one thing happens after another does not prove that the second thing was caused by the first.

Even knowledge and intelligence together are not enough to achieve a well-lived life. To get through all the complex issues that face us every day we also need wisdom. To me wisdom is the ability to make good decisions – to figure out the right thing to do – in the face of all the complexities and uncertainties of life and without ever being 100% sure that we HAVE, in fact, made the right decision.

The simplest issues we face can be solved directly by our knowledge of facts. If we are hungry and know there is food in the refrigerator then our problem is solved.

More complicated issues can be solved by using our intelligence, our ability to think logically. Is the Affordable Care Act Constitutional? A question like that can be answered through a logical analysis of the Act and the Constitution.

For the most complex problems though, and for the most complex decisions we face, we will often find that all of our knowledge and all of our intelligence are not enough to tell us the answer. In these cases we have to sort through the elements of the problem to understand it deeply, we have to sort through the available facts and arguments to determine which are most important, we have to decide which of our goals are most important and how our decisions will affect those goals, we have to consider human nature and human feelings and human values, and then we have to make the best call we can.

After the Civil War was it better policy to punish the South or to show mercy? Will it be better for the United States to expel all undocumented immigrants or find a pathway to citizenship for most of them? Questions like these can only be answered well with wisdom – the ability to make good real-life decision in complex situations where we cannot follow a simple formula and where we cannot ever be absolutely sure that we are right.

3. How do we develop mental skills?

Given the vital importance of these skills: Knowledge, Intelligence, and Wisdom, what is the best way to get them?

Some people might think there is no way to develop these skills, we just have to accept whatever we are born with and be happy with that. This is clearly wrong. Every day through observation and conversation and reading we can pack more facts into our brains which means we are increasing our knowledge. Also, it is certainly possible to learn more about the forms of argument and the logical syllogisms, which are the tools of intelligence and, by doing this, we can sharpen our own intelligent. Finally, by watching people make difficult life decisions in complex situations we can learn from examples of wisdom and, little-by-little, deepen our own wisdom.

Clearly it is possible to increase our knowledge and intelligence and wisdom. One of the best ways to do that is by reading good books. The task will not be easy, it is something we will have to work at day by day, year by year, over the course of an entire lifetime, but I believe the results will be more than worth the effort...

Like all big and complicated goals this one is more likely to be achieved with careful planning. We should make a yearly reading plan, listing books that will improve our minds and then working our way through them one-by-one.

I have heard people argue it is better to learn from experience than from reading books - and there may be some truth to this where experience is possible - but consider all the experiences that are IMPOSSIBLE, all the experiences you will NEVER have if you don't read books: living through the Great Depression, witnessing the trial and death of Socrates, suffering through the Battle of the Bulge in World War II, listening to Einstein talk about the theory of relativity, sitting in the White House as Abraham Lincoln decides what to do about secession, watching that first split second of time when the entire universe exploded into existence, or participating in the daily lives of Native American families a thousand years before the white man arrived, all these amazing experiences are things you will never know at all unless you learn about them through books.

If we really want to gain more knowledge and sharpen our intelligence and deepen our wisdom shouldn't we plan to spend as much time as possible with the most knowledgeable and the most intelligent and the wisest people who have ever lived? Unless you have the power to travel magically through space and time the only way you can spend time with these people is by reading the great books they wrote or the great books that have been written about them.

Some books contain lots of information, lots of facts about interesting and useful topics. Reading these books will help us to increase our knowledge.

Some books are either directly about logical thinking skills or show us examples of thinking skills in action as brilliant people make discoveries or solve problems. A book about argumentation might teach us thinking skills directly. A book about how a particular scientific discovery was made might teach us thinking skills indirectly, by showing us examples of those skills in use.

Some books are about the great issues of life: right and wrong, happiness and pain, success and failure, the need to make vital personal decisions without any way of knowing for sure if we are really choosing right. Other books show us examples of people working their way through life and let us watch them trying to deal with these issues and decisions we all have to face along our way. These are the books that can teach us something about how to be wise.

In truth, every book we read can increase our knowledge, our intelligence, AND our wisdom but some books are better suited to developing one or the other of these mental skills. In the list below I have divided the books into three groups of four, one group best suited to increase knowledge, one group best suited to sharpen intelligence, and one group best suited to deepen wisdom.

So here they are, the twelve books on my 2017-2018 Knowledge – Intelligence – Wisdom reading plan.

4. Reading Plan: Year 1

Knowledge

1. The Story of Philosophy

Will Durant

I will read this book primarily for knowledge. Philosophers think hard about deep issues of life like how can we tell the difference between the true and the false, the good and the bad, the beautiful and the ugly. If I want to think clearly about these important issues I will need my brain well-stocked with facts about what others have thought about them.

2. The Passion of the Western Mind

Richard Tarnas

I will read this book primarily for knowledge. This great book traces all of Western intellectual history from the ancient Greeks to the 20th century. It covers ideas from philosophy, religion, science, and the arts. If I want to think clearly about the ideas that have seemed important in Western Civilization, like the central importance of logic and rationality, I need my brain well-stocked with facts about what people from all fields of knowledge have said about these ideas over the last 25 centuries.

3. The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers, Seventh ed.

Robert L. Heilbroner

I will read this book for knowledge. Economics is one of the most important subjects in the world because it tells us so much about how the world works, how human needs are satisfied or fail to get satisfied, how we can organize society in such a way that all of us can have better lives. Economics is also a vital subject because so many of us know virtually nothing about it which makes it easy for the greedy, the politicians, and the cranks to fool us and get us to support policies that will benefit them rather than ourselves.

4. The World's Religions

Huston Smith

I will read this book for knowledge. For much of human history religious beliefs have been big motivators of human behavior. The more we know about the religions of the world the better we will be able to understand what many people, groups, or even whole countries, are doing and why they are doing it.

Intelligence

5. 76 Fallacies

Dr. Michael Cooper LaBossiere

I will read this book to sharpen my intelligence. Like a chess master studies positions from great games a thinker studies fallacies. These are the unsound arguments you have to spot when other people use them and avoid using yourself. The more you know about fallacies the smarter you will be. This book should help.

6. How to Think Clearly

Doug Erlandson

I will study this book to sharpen my intelligence. The more we learn about the principles of clear thinking, and the more we put those principles into practice every day on every issue we face, the smarter we will be.

7. The Double Helix

James D. Watson

I will read this book to sharpen my intelligence. This very great book tells the inside story of one of the greatest scientific discoveries of the 20th century, the structure of DNA. As we watch very human scientists struggling to solve a tough problem we can pick up some tips that might help us with problems we have to solve.

8. Lonely Hearts of the Cosmos

Dennis Overbye

I will read this book primarily to sharpen my intelligence. This is one of the best popular science books ever written. It describes how scientists have tried to figure out the size and origins and fate of the universe. As we read about how scientists think about these hard questions we can learn how to think better ourselves and thus become more intelligent.

Wisdom

9. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin

Benjamin Franklin

Studying the lives of great people is a good way to seek wisdom. We can try to learn from exceptional people what kinds of choices we have to make in life, what kinds of options we have in making those choices, and what kinds of consequences we might expect from those options. Don't forget to learn from bad choices so you won't have to make them yourself! This kind of learning will start us on the road to attaining wisdom.

10. Walden

Henry David Thoreau

I will read this book mainly for wisdom. Thoreau spent a little over two years living in a cabin near Walden Pond in Massachusetts. He took walks and read books and grew beans... and thought about life, and then wrote his thoughts down to help us think about life. Thinking about how we should live, trying to figure out what is the best way to live, those are certainly aspects of what we call wisdom.

11. The Life of Samuel Johnson

James Boswell

I will read this book mainly in the quest for wisdom. Boswell's brilliant biography mainly shows us Johnson talking. He thought about everything and then he talked about everything. And talked and talked and talked. Johnson was a brilliant man who studied history and literature and philosophy and wrote plays and poems and biographies and the first dictionary of the English language. Reading and thinking about Johnson's ideas about life will help us sort through and evaluate our own ideas about life, rejecting the bad ones while keeping the good ones and letting them guide us... and that is wisdom.

12. Plutarch's Lives

Plutarch

I will read this book primarily for wisdom. Plutarch wrote biographies in pairs comparing ancient Greek and Roman generals, statesmen, orators. By studying their lives I can learn what was important to them and how they lived and that will help me think about what is important to me and how I should live. I can learn about the various life choices these people made and think about whether I agree or disagree with them, and why, and that will help me to make better life choices for myself... and that is wisdom!

~~~

So this is my 2017-2018 Knowledge, Intelligence, Wisdom Reading Plan. I am looking forward to becoming more knowledgeable by learning more facts, becoming smarter by learning more about thinking skills, becoming wiser by watching great people make important life decisions and by watching how those decisions turned out.

Next year there will be a fresh set of books to enjoy and learn from, but for this year, let's read these!


***
[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the ones above in this essay to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]
***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

If We All Want Something Good... How Come We Can't Agree?

Years ago I tried to think of the most important value pursued by each of the major political worldviews in the United States. Of course these values have to be GOOD things because everyone believes their side IS good and right. I came up with these:

  • Principles - for the Conservatives
  • Brotherhood - for the Progressives (I called them Liberals when I did this)
  • Freedom, for the Libertarians.

The author of "The Three Languages of Politics" did a similar analysis and came up with three axes:

  • Conservatives support civilization and oppose barbarism
  • Progressives support the oppressed and oppose oppressors
  • Libertarians support liberty and oppose coercion.

Each of the three axes moves from good to evil. Civilization is good while barbarism is evil; the oppressed are good (or at least we have no reason to think otherwise given the mere fact that they are oppressed) while oppressors are evil; liberty is good while coercion is evil.

This analysis is very important for at least two reasons: First: it can help us to understand what people believe and why. Second: it might help us to communicate more effectively and reach more productive compromises by trying to give each side something that it wants.

Think about police shootings of minorities, for example. According to this book conservatives support the police because the police defend civilization; Progressives support the victims because they are oppressed; Libertarians oppose the multitude of unnecessary coercive laws that "create" too many criminals and too many police-civilian interactions.

Everybody wants something good: defending civilization is good, defending the oppressed is good; opposing unnecessary laws is good, and yet, we still disagree and seem incapable of reaching an agreement or even a compromise.

But maybe, understanding better what each group wants could help us put together a successful compromise position. As an overly simplified example maybe we could:

  • Punish more harshly criminals who assault cops (for the Conservatives),
  • Punish more harshly cops who violate the law (for the Progressives),
  • Reduce the number of unnecessary laws (for Libertarians.)

Would that work? Could we get all sides to agree? Would a similar approach work for other issues?

Might be worth a try!

***

[This great book can help us understand how our political opponents think, which could help us finally to really communicate and even compromise.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Monday, September 4, 2017

Three American Heroes at the My Lai Massacre

September 5, 2017 will be the 48th anniversary of Lt. William Calley being charged with murder for the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. Calley would eventually serve just three-and-a-half years under house arrest and then be released due to irregularities at his trial. Nobody else was ever punished for the murders of 347 unarmed civilians at My Lai on March 16, 1968.

The crew of one OH-23 Raven observation helicopter tried to stop the killing. Pilot Hugh Thompson, Jr., door gunner Laurence Colburn, and crew chief Glenn Andreotta used green smoke to mark a group of wounded Vietnamese civilians so they could get help. Later the crew saw that everyone in this group had been killed. They marked another wounded Vietnamese woman with green smoke and then watched as an American Captain walked up to her, kicked her, and shot her.

Thompson, Colburn, and Andreotta made several more attempts to rescue civilians and were able to get some of them evacuated to safety. At one point Thompson set his helicopter down between American soldiers and Vietnamese civilians and told his men to fire on the Americans if necessary to stop the killing.

It was this helicopter crew that reported the massacre to their base that day and got a Lieutenant-Colonel to order the men on the ground to "knock off the killing."

Andreotta was killed in action just three weeks after his brave intervention at My Lai. Thompson and Colburn survived the war and the whole helicopter crew was awarded the Soldier's Medal for bravery not in the face of the enemy 30 years after My Lai in 1998. A Major-General Ackerman said at the award ceremony that "It was the ability to do the right thing even at the risk of their personal safety that guided these soldiers to do what they did" and that they "set the standard for all soldiers to follow."

Sometimes all the normal rules of civilized behavior seem to disappear and people find themselves in nightmares of danger and fear and violence. In those terrible times I hope there will always be people like Thompson and Colburn and Andreotta. People who try to stop us - even in chaos and blood and confusion - stop us from sliding completely into hell by still having the moral clarity to know what is right and by still having the courage to do it.

Hugh Thompson, Jr., Laurence Colburn, and Glenn Andreotta are American heroes and they are my heroes.

[The My Lai Massacre was the most terrible atrocity committed by American troops in Vietnam. This book is about a true American hero who tried to stop it.]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Was Colluding with Russia OK?

This morning on CNN there was a discussion with a group of Trump supporters. One of the questions they were asked was something like: Does it bother you there might have been collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia? All but one of the group of seven said no, it doesn't bother them. As seeming justification for their position they said the US has interfered in foreign elections.

It sounds like they are trying to make the argument that: BECAUSE the US has interfered in foreign elections THEREFORE, it is OK for foreign countries to interfere in our elections and since it is OK for foreign countries to interfere in our elections THEREFORE, it is OK for Americans to collude with foreign countries who are interfering in our elections.

Is this a good argument?

Now many people don't care if they are making good arguments. When many people set out to defend their TRIBES they don't care about facts or logic, they just defend their tribe at any cost.

But WE are not like that.... WE are intelligent human beings who want to think carefully and make sure we have good reasons for what we believe and what we do.

So let's examine the argument I heard this morning.

One way to examine an argument is to apply it to a different, but similar situation, and see if it still makes sense.

***

What if we were not talking about an election, what if we were talking about business instead? Let's apply the election argument to a business case and see if it still makes sense.

BECAUSE my employer is trying to undersell a competitor in order to win a contract THEREFORE, it is OK for our competitor to try to undersell my employer to win the contract and since it is OK for our competitor to try to undersell my employer THEREFORE, it is OK for me to to collude with our competitor in trying to undersell my employer.

That doesn't really work does it? It does not follow from the fact that my company is trying to undersell a competitor that it is OK for me to collude with the competitor in trying to undersell my company. In fact, if I were caught doing that, I would be accused of disloyalty and I would certainly be fired.

***

Let's try another example. What if my country is fighting a battle against an enemy during a war. Let's see how the argument looks in that situation:

BECAUSE my country is trying to defeat an enemy in battle THEREFORE, it is OK for the enemy to try to defeat my country in battle and since it is OK for our enemy to try to defeat my country in battle THEREFORE, it is OK for me to to collude with our enemy in trying to defeat my country in battle.

That doesn't work either does it? It certainly does not follow from the fact that because my country is trying to defeat an enemy in battle that it is OK for me to collude with the enemy in trying to defeat my own country in battle. In fact, if I were caught doing that, I would be accused of disloyalty and I would most likely be charged with treason, and possibly executed for my crime.

***

So an argument might sound reasonable to us just because it supports what we want to believe. But if we apply that argument to other situations and see that it makes no sense than it probably makes no sense in the place where it was originally used either.

Based on this analysis our conclusion is that even if the US has interfered in foreign elections, whether rightly or wrongly, it does not follow from this that an American is justified in colluding with a foreign country to interfere in our elections. In fact, colluding with a foreign country to interfere in a US election would prove that you were disloyal to your country and to its political system, and a person who is disloyal to the US should certainly not be working for the US government.

[Based on the direction we are moving now it might be wise to learn about the last time a dangerous President had to be removed. This book looks like a good place to start. Please buy it, read it, let me know how it is!]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Sunday, July 16, 2017

The Trump Hypothesis

Shortly after we found out about the meeting between Trump, Jr., Manafort, Kushner, and the "Russian government lawyer," we found out there were more people in the room. One of them was connected with Russian counter-intelligence. However this particular detail turns out... it just felt like the last straw to me.

I'm going to propose what I now think is a very reasonable hypothesis for testing:

"In 2015-2016 the Russian government and Russian intelligence launched an operation to put a friendly person into the White House, someone who would give them favorable treatment over sanctions, the Ukraine, and other issues. They used a variety of methods they are known to have used in other countries. At some point, the campaign they were helping began communicating with them and cooperating with them in this operation and the Russian choice for 2016 is now the President of the United States."

The first part of the hypothesis - that there was a Russian operation - is already supported by overwhelming evidence. The second part of the hypothesis - that an American Presidential candidate cooperated with a Russian intelligence operation designed to make him President - is becoming more likely with every new revelation.

So that's my hypothesis. Now we will test it with all the available evidence. Let's see if it's true. If it is not true, no harm done. If it is true, this will be a tragedy for the United States, and an embarrassment of epic proportions.

***

[Now that Trump is President we better learn all we can about him. This book looks like a good place to start. Please buy it, read it, let me know how it is!]

[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Practical Thinking for Busy People

To be PRACTICAL thinkers we have to be able to make reasonably good decisions without spending 12 hours per day doing research. We have to be able to do this even in areas where we don't have expertise.

How is this possible? Even if we can't expect to make PERFECT decisions - and never make a mistake - can we at least find a way to make GOOD decisions given the very limited amount of time most of us have available for research?

Let's take a look at the Senate health care bill as an example.

To be honest I don't have time to read the Senate health care bill. To be even more honest I might not understand the bill even if I did have time to read it. Still, I feel like I have to know SOMETHING about this bill. I feel like I have to know enough to decide if I should call my Senator and say "support it" or "reject it."

So what can I do? Well, what if someone with more time and expertise than I have reads the bill and reports on it? Maybe I can rely on them.... In fact, this is exactly what the Congressional Budget Office does. I feel confident the people at the CBO are smart enough to understand this bill better than I would. Of course, the CBO might make a mistake but I certainly trust them more than I trust politicians who are arguing about a partisan political issue. So using the CBO report to help me make a decision about this bill seems like a good potential strategy.

Sadly, it turns out, I don't have time to read the CBO report either! Even more sadly, I might not have the background knowledge or expertise to even understand the CBO report. So what can I do now? Can I find someone who can read the CBO report and kind of summarize it for me?

Fortunately, many newspapers and news magazines have done just that. I will turn to a magazine I like and trust: The Atlantic. I have a reasonable level of confidence in the writers at this magazine. I think they are smart and honest so let me see what they say about the CBO report.

This is what I found in the article below which reports on the CBO report for the Senate health care bill:

  • The Senate health plan will increase the number of uninsured Americans by 22 million over the next 10 years.
  • Premiums will go up at first but then come down to less than what they are now.
  • For many people total costs will rise, however, because plans will cover less and deductibles will be higher.
  • The government will save $321 billion over 10 years. (Since the federal budget is approaching $4 trillion this means we will save less than 1% of the budget.)

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/cbo-senate-republican-bill-22-million/531663/

Summarizing what I learned from this article I get:

  • Many more people without insurance
  • Total costs higher
  • Coverage less
  • Savings negligible...

My conclusion: BAD PLAN! Try again. So now I know I should call my Senator and say "Reject this bill!" And if he says "Why?" I even have bullet points to share and a source to reference so I don't sound like an idiot.

If I have a little more time I could read a second article in another magazine to see if it basically agrees with this one. If I wanted to be very careful I could try to read one article from a liberal magazine and one article from a conservative magazine. If they both agree on certain key points about the CBO report I can probably be pretty sure that is the truth about what is in the CBO report.

In the example I am writing about in this essay I am relying on the CBO report to help me decide whether I should support the Senate health care bill or not and I am relying on one or two news articles to help me understand what is in the CBO report.

Now I admit, if I have the time and the expertise to read the whole Senate health care bill and understand it and make a decision about it then that is what I should do. If I DON'T have the time and expertise to do that then this little essay describes a way to make a reasonable decision anyway. This "shortcut" method is not perfect but it is PRACTICAL. It is certainly better than making a decision based solely on feelings or partisan speeches, certainly better than doing nothing, certainly better than throwing up my hands in despair.

So this is what I call PRACTICAL thinking: find a source you trust and understand and that you have time to read. If you have time, check it with a second source. Look at the facts presented and make your best decision.

As a final note, keep your mind open. If someone says your decision is wrong ask them why they think that. If they have good reasons, adjust your thinking accordingly. If they don't have good reasons stick to your original decision and move on to the next issue! :-)

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

***
[This looks like a great book about critical thinking. If you read it before I do please send me a review I can publish here at Anything Smart.]
[If you want to support Anything Smart just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. Anything Smart will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Sunday, May 28, 2017

Testing Beliefs

Good thinking is the essential foundation for all our efforts to be successful in life, to achieve our goals, to create better lives for ourselves and our families, and a better society for everyone. Whether we are choosing a mechanic to work on our car or a doctor to perform surgery, buying a house or planning for retirement, changing jobs or voting in an election, the quality of our thinking will have a lot to do with whether we succeed or fail, whether we win or lose, whether we make our lives, and our world, better or worse.

Bad thinking, on the other hand, leads to failures and foolish mistakes; it leads to missed opportunities and leaves us at the mercy of manipulators who cunningly make sure they get what they want... without any regard to what is best for us. It can even lead to injustice, or worse: as Voltaire once said, “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

Learning to think better is a lifelong quest but it begins with the recognition that good thinking is important, vital to our success, in some cases even a matter of life and death, and then making a conscious effort to improve our critical thinking skills.

"Criticism is the examination and test of propositions of any kind which are offered for acceptance, in order to find out whether they correspond to reality or not. The critical faculty is a product of education and training. It is a mental habit and power. It is a prime condition of human welfare that men and women should be trained in it. It is our only guarantee against delusion, deception, superstition, and misapprehension of ourselves and our earthly circumstances."

A lot of critical thinking just comes down to asking ourselves questions about our beliefs and then trying to answer them:

  • What is it exactly that you believe?
  • Can you clearly and unambiguously define the words and phrases you use to express your belief?

  • How important is the belief?
  • Is it something very important that is worth spending a lot of time on or not? (Deciding which restaurant to have lunch at should not take much time. Deciding which house to buy should take quite a lot of time.)

  • Why do you believe what you believe?
  • Do you have strong evidence or just weak evidence?
  • Can you prove it with a logical argument? (Remember that "proof" comes in different "levels." It can be a matter of probability, or beyond a reasonable doubt, or actually certain, which will usually only happen in mathematics.)
  • Do you have to depend on expert testimony or can you analyze the evidence for yourself? (Don't be afraid to listen to experts and learn from them. That's what experts are for!)

  • Do you have time to learn more about your belief by reading articles or books?
  • How do good thinkers defend your belief?
  • How do good thinkers oppose your belief?
  • Which side has the best evidence and the best arguments?

In real life we can't always be sure we know the truth. In cases like that you don't have to be paralyzed.

  • Can you at least explain why a particular belief is beneficial to you?
  • Makes you're life better?
  • Makes society better?

If you can answer these questions in the affirmative then it is OK to keep right on believing something you can't prove. Just don't pretend your belief is based on facts and logic, admit that it is based on your faith and your values rather than some kind of proof.

Whatever else you do, keep thinking and keep learning!

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

***
[This looks like a great book about critical thinking. If you read it before I do please send me a review I can publish here at Anything Smart.]
[If you want to support Anything Smart just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. Anything Smart will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Good Cops and Bad Cops - Bad Georgia Cops Assault a Man in Public

What do we do when two police officers beat a man right out in public, in broad daylight, with no excuse?

Unfortunately, that's what we are going to have to find out in Gwinnett County, Georgia.

This barbaric incident occurred about 4:00 PM on Wednesday 12 April 2017 when Sergeant Michael Bongiovanni pulled over 21 year old Demetrius Hollins in Lawrenceville, just outside Atlanta.

According to the sources below Hollis was pulled over for a broken taillight and a missing license plate.

What should have been a simple, and non-violent, stop quickly spiraled out of control.

Bongiovanni ended up arresting Hollis and according to one of the sources below Hollis was tasered multiple times in the course of that arrest.

Master Police Officer Robert McDonald showed up to "help" his supervisor Bongiovanni and a witness got him on video running up to Hollis and stomping or kicking his head while the young man lay handcuffed on the ground.

To give credit to the Gwinnett County Police Department this video led to the firing of McDonald less than 24 hours after the incident.

Then a second video showed up and revealed what had happened a little earlier: Hollis came out of his car, with both hands in the air, and Bongiovanni punched him in the face!

Bongiovanni had never mentioned this punch in his report, and had claimed Hollis resisted arrest, so he was fired for lying.

The department quickly issued a statement: "We are fortunate that this second video was found and we were able to move swiftly to terminate a supervisor who lied and stepped outside of his training and state law."

The statement also says that the video: "...shows the man getting out of the car with both hands up. As he stands with his hands up, [Sergeant] Michael Bongiovanni strikes the man in the face."

Police Chief Butch Ayers added: "...there is literally no excuse for behavior like this" and "...that punch was unreasonable and unnecessary."

The department has now launched criminal investigations on both McDonald and Bongiovanni - and good for them! - that's exactly what they should do!

Bad cops cause pain and suffering and they need to be punished for that. Hollis described his encounter as "the scariest moment of my life."

Hollis's lawyer said "We want them to have to stand before a Gwinnett County judge in a courtroom full of Gwinnett County citizens, with their legs shackled and their hands cuffed behind their back."

There are so many good cops risking their lives to protect us. When we find bad cops like McDonald and Bongiovanni they need to be punished and made into examples.

This link has video of the attack:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/georgia-officials-dismiss-89-cases-linked-fired-officers/story?id=46819260

The video is also available here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/second-georgia-cop-canned-after-violence-caught-on-video-during-arrest/

http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/14/us/georgia-gwinnett-county-officers-fired-video-trnd/index.html

http://theinsidekorea.com/2017/04/16/georgia-cop-fired-for-stomping-handcuffed-black-man-in-the/

***

Copyright © 2017 by Joseph Wayne Gadway

***
[This is the original Good Cops and Bad Cops book. Check it out.]
[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]

***