Just doing a thought experiment....
Imagine a mayor of a small city: The Chief of Police in that city is investigating the mayor for possible crimes. The mayor fires the Chief of Police. The mayor tells someone that when he did the firing he was thinking that the investigation into him was unjustified. Later he tells someone else that the firing took the pressure off him....
Now, I'm not a lawyer but I kind of think that, just based on this alone, I might be able to persuade a jury this mayor was trying to interfere in an investigation and obstruct justice.
Just thinkin'.
***
[This looks like an interesting book about the Trump / Russia collusion case. If you read it before I do please send me a review I can publish here.]
[If you want to support "Anything Smart" just click on book links like the one below to buy your books. "Anything Smart" will receive a commission. Thanks!]
***
Copyright © 2018 by Joseph Wayne Gadway
